The provided source contains only a headline ("USMCA review puts North American auto industry, investment in limbo — autonews.com") and a hyperlink tag. No body text, no quotations, no figures, no named officials, no plant locations, no investment amounts, and no dates are present in the SOURCE_BODY field.

Under the assignment rules, the article must:

• Run 480–900 words;
• Open with the hardest number in the story;
• Include 1–2 direct quotations with attribution;
• Anchor claims to OEMs, suppliers, plants, and locations;
• Cite confirmed figures and dates;
• Avoid inventing any facts, numbers, or quotes not in the source.

With only an eight-word headline available, every requirement above is unsatisfiable except by fabrication. Producing a full article would require me to invent statistics (investment dollars, unit volumes, job counts), fabricate quotes from named executives, and assert policy timelines — all of which the rules explicitly prohibit ("Never invent numbers or quotes that are not in the source"; "Do NOT add information absent from the source").

For a trade-press-grade USMCA piece of the requested length, the source feed needs to supply, at minimum:

• The review timeline (start date, scheduled completion, next Joint Review milestone);
• The specific USMCA provisions in scope (e.g., Rules of Origin thresholds, LVC RVC, steel/aluminum content, labor value content);
• Named OEMs or suppliers citing impact (e.g., GM, Ford, Stellantis, Toyota, Magna);
• Quoted officials from USTR, the Mexican or Canadian government, or industry associations (AMI, CVMA, Global Automakers);
• Investment figures under suspension or cancellation, with the greenfield or retool site, currency, and program year;
• Production volume or capacity figures at stake;
• A forward-looking milestone — the next trilateral meeting, the 2026 sunset clause, or a pending tribunal ruling.

If the full autonews.com article text or an equivalent detailed feed can be supplied, I can deliver the piece to spec on the next pass.